On Monday 30 January 2006 8:02 pm, Neil Williams wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 5:15 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > Developers, > > Here's a proposal. My understanding is that this proposal for a > > change of policy will not take effect until it is accepted.
OK, let me just explain a bit about this: This proposal is framed as an "either or" choice when what is needed is a sharing approach. I made a request for this which backfired - the infamous QOF external discussions - but the thrust of that discussion has been lost. All I ever wanted was a little consideration that if I've announced an imminent release it is sensible to let me know about pending changes that are out of tree; if someone is working on a problem in libqof, let me know and just check if there are constraints that would break other programs. All done in an atmosphere of sharing, cooperation, goodwill and for the general improvement of all related code. I do value the contributions of all gnucash developers and their assistance - such assistance has helped me see how to fix _global just today - I don't want to lose all that unless absolutely essential to my sanity. :-) I just want to get back to G2, that's all. All this is just an unnecessary distraction. Let's decide once G2 is out. I'll take any burden from postponing the decision until then. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpjogKYwFosJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
