Derek Atkins schrieb:
<aside>
BTW, this is only slightly less horrible than macros that use local
variables from their calling context. The general rule is, "If it
looks like a function, it sure better behave like a function." (*)
</aside>
See, I never make the assumption that Macro == Function, even
if it looks like one.
Actually I do. (should we have a vote on this one? :) And as a reader of
someone else's code I would actually prefer very much to not have macros
affect the control flow of the calling function. So in this discussion I
indeed agree with Chris' explanation: It might be a big convenience for
the one who is writing the macro, but for the one reading the code it's
a PITA and if at all possible it should rather be avoided... Basically
I'd view this just as our ChangeLog policy: People might consider
writing an extra ChangeLog entry a big inconvenience for them, but when
reading someone else's commits, it's a substantial simplification for
looking up particular changes.
Christian
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel