Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> Once lot->splits == NULL, there are no splits, so unless there is some
> other way that the payment might be tied in, it would be safe to
> replace "lot->account = NULL" with "qof_instance_set_destroying(lot,
> TRUE)".
No, I do not think it would be safe to destroy the lot from under the
invoice, at lease without auditing all uses of the API.
> Phil
-derek
PS: I'll just note that this is why I keep saying that the DB backend
is just a data store; putting in table requirements like this just
causes problems for GnuCash and just makes everyone's life more
difficult.
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
