On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > On Thu, December 16, 2010 5:03 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 schrieb Geert Janssens: >>> On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote: >>>>> The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt >>> my >>>>> working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash screen shows >>>>> 'built from svn r19910 on 2010-12-06' even though this is not the >>>>> case. The 'About ...' shows the same. Previously it always showed >>> the >>>>> correct data. It is the same on both of my systems. Are others >>> seeing >>>>> the same or is it something about my systems? >>>>> >>>>> Alex >>>> >>>> Same problem here since a couple of days. No update of the working >>>> version since 19913. >>>> Juergen >>> >>> The svn version is read from a generated file, gnc-svninfo.h. This file >>> has >>> recently been moved to another directory. It's possible that the old >>> file >>> is still available and being found before the new file. >> >> I've implemented the include path with directory. This way, the new file >> should be picked correctly now. Does it work with r19952 and higher again? > > I'm scared this might break different build scenarios, like building > outside the sourcedir. The sources as-is certainly build from a clean > checkout. Maybe just force-remove the file during "clean" in the old > location? >
Indeed, that was Mike's original reason for moving it from gnome-utils: I had added a path include in the sql backend for recording the revision number in the database for change control. If core-utils is specified with a -I directive in Makefile, then writing #include <gnc-version.h> instead of #include "gnc-version.h" should ensure that the leftover one in gnome-utils isn't picked up. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel