On maandag 21 maart 2011, Phil Longstaff wrote: > Geert, > > you've just checked in 4 patches. How should we mark patches which should > be back-ported to the 2.4 branch? Should I just pick and choose? > Good question.
I seem to remember the devs used to prefix their commit messages with BP in the 2.2.x/trunk period. I found this in the wiki: http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Development_Process#Changeset_Auditing_Process In any case the patches I just applied (a complete series of 12 patches) are definitely trunk only. They together update the windows build dependencies to allow for Guile 1.8.x. The changes are fairly invasive and may definitely bring instability in the build tree. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621238 for more details about this series of patches. Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
