--On September 23, 2011 8:51:54 PM +0200 Micha Lenk <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.09.2011 00:10, schrieb Geert Janssens:
On donderdag 22 september 2011, Mike Alexander wrote:
Author: mta
Date: 2011-09-22 17:04:51 -0400 (Thu, 22 Sep 2011)
New Revision: 21302
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21302
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src/app-utils/Makefile.am
Log:
The build fails if python bindings are requested and parallel build
is on. The make file knows how to build libgncmod-app-utils.la but
doesn't realize that
${top_builddir}/src/app-utils/libgncmod-app-utils.la is the same
file.
[...]
Great ! This one has been bothering me for a while, but I didn't
manage to fix it. Thanks a lot!
Does it make sense to backport such changes to the 2.4 branch?
I am asking because I recently uploaded a Debian package for Gnucash
with enabled Python bindings. Another Debian Developer reported
parallel builds to fail with Python bindings enabled, so this could
be of help in the stable branch too...
Yes, that change and r21301 which also affects building with the Python
bindings could be backported. They are minor enough that the
probability of them causing problems is small especially since they
have not effect at all if the Python bindings are not requested.
Mike
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
