Am Montag, 1. April 2013, 13:12:15 schrieb Derek Atkins: > "Derek Atkins" <de...@ihtfp.com> writes: > > Hi there. > > One more update. > > > > It looks like the 2.4 daily build completed and uploaded just fine. > > However it did not go ahead and build the 2.5.0 tag. > > > > I don't know why it didn't (re-?)build 2.5.0. I don't see anything in > > the logs. And I don't see why the 2.4.12 tag build would fail where > > the 2.4 branch build worked fine.. :( > > FYI, I removed the 2.5.0 tag from the list of tags in > /c/soft/packaing/tags -- I'm not sure if that's the right place or not? > There are like three copies of the packaging directory in various places > and I don't know which is the right one anymore. The bat file seems to > use all of them for some reason. > > I did not restart the daily build to try to rebuild the 2.5.0 tag. I'd > like to try to figure out why the 2.4.12 tag-build failed, too. :-/
I'd like to ignore the 2.4.12 tag as we've successfully reached a 2.4.12 binary. As for the 2.5.0 tag: You've removed the line from the correct tag file. I don't know why it didn't run. I did the same thing a few minutes ago: I removed the 2.5.0 line from the file c:\soft\packaging\tags and ran the build_tags.sh script in that directory manually. It's now correctly building the 2.5.0 tag; let's see how far it gets. It should at least copy the resulting log file to the webserver. Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel