On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:36 AM, "Derek Atkins" <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, April 2, 2013 12:57 pm, John Ralls wrote: >> >> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: >> >>> Christian Stimming <christ...@cstimming.de> writes: >>> >>>> Zitat von Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu>: >>>>>> Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now >>>>>> it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this succeeds then we probably need to re-tag 2.5.0. I'll keep an >>>>>> eye out and send another message. >>>>> >>>>> FYI, trunk seems to have built correctly.. Now it's doing the "daily" >>>>> weekly build of 2.4. Perhaps we should reduce that to weekly again? >>>>> :) >>>> >>>> Good. This means we need to re-tag 2.5.0 with current trunk, as the >>>> install-impl.sh of the tag itself wouldn't build. >>> >>> Yep. Can you do that? >> >> Alex checked something into trunk yesterday, so I'd better run distcheck >> again first to test it. > > Ok. > > Also, FYI, even though the 2.4 daily/weekly build succeeded, it did NOT > copy its results to code. I don't know why. If we care about 2.4 then > we might want to look into this. If we don't care then I guess it's not a > big deal. OK, Retagged. I'll proceed with everything else this afternoon -- I have to go to an appointment now. ISTM we'll want one more 2.4 release this summer, so it would be good to get it fixed. Do we know for sure that what's wrong there isn't also broken on trunk/2.5? Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
