Hi John
I've managed to make the left-side (activa?) match the right-side (passiva?)
https://screenshots.firefox.com/RNvkjaxnYyxpGkYn/null
1) it does require closing books on the balance-sheet date
2) it does require adding trading-accounts
The existing balsheet introduces/calculates the "Retained Earnings",
"Trading Gains" and "Unrealized Gains", whereas the current iteration of
new-balsheet will not.
To me this is the easiest method to ensure both sides produce the same
total, and is now technically correct - if the user has not closed their
books, the balance sheet won't balance.
This is giving me a headache :(
Should a new balsheet calculate and report these '(fake) retained
earnings', and 'unrealized gains' ???
C
On 09/08/18 08:32, John Ralls wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> wrote:
I haven't been following every detail of this. However I note on most balance
sheets the total assets doesn't match total net worth (or liabilities/equity).
In most, this is fixed by including the retained earnings.
I believe at least in most European countries the "left hand side" (Assets,
Active) and "right hand side" (Passive or liabilities + equity) of the
multicolumn view should balance (it's called balance sheet for a reason).
That would suggest retained earnings does have to be part of the balance
sheet.
However I'm not an accountant and perhaps your book is slightly contrived so I
don't know the exact answer here.
As for the "multi-column" vs one column debate, both present the same data.
The only difference is visual representation or style.
As of recently I have become a strong proponent of separating structure (or
accounting functionality in a different context) from style, I think this
should be delegated to the realm of css. This particular layout variation can
IMO be handled by making divs for each large group and either let them follow
normal flow or use float to move them next to each other. If you will you can
have a European style sheet and an American one, or an Australian or whatever.
As for "categories", I read Frank's earlier reply as if he agreed that at
least for now the account organization is something to be done in the CoA, not
in report code.
The Balance Sheet is indeed supposed to balance, but in normal practice it
balances only when the book is “closed”, i.e. when all of the income and
expense accounts are summed up and added to Equity. In US corporate books the
cumulative total of income and expenses lives in an Equity account called
“Retained Earnings”.
In the pen-and-paper days a “Trial Balance” was computed outside of the books
before closing as a way to catch errors before making the closing entries and
writing the formal Balance Sheet.
GnuCash's existing Balance Sheet Report creates the “Retained Earnings” line so
that one need not close the books (Tools>Close Book) in order to get a balanced
report. Removing that feature might be more formally correct but it would mean
that users would have to close their book before running a balance sheet. That
would be a big change and I don’t think that we want to do it. On the other hand
“Retained Earnings” isn’t the right term for many cases, so it would be a useful
improvement to make it configurable.
There’s a second problem with the current report as well: If the user does
close their books periodically they’ll have an account for the accumulation
that may well be called “Retained Earnings”. The Balance Sheet Report will
dutifully report the contents of that account and, if there are income and
expenses after the last close, add a second “Retained Earnings” line. That
looks a bit odd and might be confusing; ISTR we’ve had comments on the user
list about just that.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
