Am 16.09.18 um 18:55 schrieb Geert Janssens: > Op zaterdag 15 september 2018 19:31:26 CEST schreef David T. via gnucash- > devel: >> And if we’re going there, the main project includes numerous README files in >> gnucash/doc, all of which need similar treatment. README files for WIN32, >> HCBI and OFX should IMHO be removed altogether in favor of other venues >> (didn’t HBCI get replaced by FinTS in, like, 2002?). > > The Windows README files are a special case, they serve as introductory text > in the Windows installer. So they can't be removed. But perhaps we can move > them to the gnucash-on-windows repository. I'd have to check where the > installer code expects them and whether we can change this. > > As for HBCI I think it's still called like that in Germany. But Frank will > have to confirm this. What other venues do you suggest for HBCI and OFX ?
Yes, in 2002 FinTS 3.0 was released as successor of HBCI 2.2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FinTS A few more details in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Transaction_Services The today most common PIN/TAN methods are strictly seen no part of HBCI, but of FinTS. And recently on the german list a banker told a user HBCI is obsolete. https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-de/2018-September/010467.html IIRC, when I started some renaming in our references, Christian had a few objections. So let us ask him about his recent opinion. > And as you're finding issues faster than we can fix them, please file a bug > report. It will get lost here on the list archives. +1 > Geert ~Frank _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
