Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's a good concern. If you could use the "normal" postgres setup
> where you had one server and you connected to it via SSH (or
> whatever), you'd be set, but I don't know off the top of my head
> whether or not postgres' physical databases are platform independent,
> same goes for sqlite -- definitely something we'd have to
> investigate...
I think finding an embedded sql system would be a great approach,
provided the database is portable. I think the overhead of setting up
a SQL server is greater than many users want to have, but if we can
get the benefits of a database by using an embedded system (which
would hide from the user the fact that SQL is being used), that would
be ideal. The user still sees a "file" but we're using SQL internally.
So, any good pointers to embedded SQL systems?
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
