On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:58, Paul Lussier wrote: > In a message dated: 03 Apr 2002 13:00:41 PST > Chris Lyttle said: > > >Actually this whole thread started off with a USER request to revert to > >a BINARY format as it was faster, smaller and easier for him. So going > >along the lines of your arguments it sort of defeats your point as its > >pretty obvious to me that the programmers on gnucash DO listen to what > >their users ask for. > > I never stated that the GnuCash developers don't listen to what their > users ask for. I've been following the development of GnuCash and a
You're right, you didnt actually state this, but it was implied in your reasoning about why not to use SQL. > Additionally, while what you state about the origin of the thread is true, > I find that almost totally irrelevent to the rest of the conversation > which has since taken place. > So now instead of attacking the developers, you turn to saying my input is 'irrelevant'? I'm a user, I'm expressing my viewpoint on this thread, how is it that what I say is irrelevant? How about being constructive and telling us some of the disadvantages technically you see to using SQL instead of 'I dont like SQL cause I cant open it with a text editor and change things'? Chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
