I definitely want to keep CVS at gnucash.org. My only question with using GNOME's bug-tracking system is: how hard would be it to add new developers to the bug-tracking ACL for gnucash, and can we limit access _only_ to gnucash developers? I honestly don't want some random gnome developer to close out or re-prioritize gnucash bugs.
So long as there is at least a link from the gnucash.org homepage (and probably bugs.gnucash.org) then I dont honestly care where the system actually lives. -derek Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is one idea that might work. We could piggyback as it were on what > is done in GNOME for bugs. How would people feel about this, or is there > a strong preference for keeping all the GnuCash things centered around > gnucash.org? > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
