On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 07:30, Derek Atkins wrote: > True. If you change a reconciled split in this manner it should warn > you and, if you still continue, it should reset the reconcile flag (or > at least ask you what to do). > > Note that I don't know what happens if you change the account on the > 'current' split. The txn should disappear as soon as you commit it.
It does. > > Deleting this particular split entry is a great way to imbalance a > > transaction. (Its probably a bug that this particular split, the one > > connecting the transaction to the currently open account, can be changed > > or deleted.) > > I don't want to think about this. But yea, the user can really shoot > themselves in the foot. Does gnucash not detect imbalanced > transactions at this point? If so, that's a bug. Not until you check for imbalanced transactions. > Personally, I think the logic in the split-ledger-control.c:...traverse() > is broken. I also think it's broken in the entryledger.. Broken how? David
signature_asc_DEFANGED-109648.DEFANGED-231
Description: application/defanged-231
