I think it probably depends on the magnitude of the changes. Considering 1.8.0 is currently planned for 1 month from now, I don't think that holding up patches for a month is all that horrendous. OTOH, if the changes are small enough and backwards compatible, putting them in the 1.8 tree might not be out of the question.
-derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:33:58AM +0100, Christian Stimming was heard to remark: > > Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: > [...] > > >>You are welcome to work on a gtk-2 port, but don't expect any changes > > >>to be incorporated until after the 1.8 release. > > Maybe if the changes were appropriately ifdefed, they would be > acceptible? Or would the changes cause far too many ifdefs to be > practical? > > --linas > > -- > pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933 > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
