Reinke Bonte wrote:

Moreover, giving money to an individual developer would make me feel bad
about the others. I don't even know who developed which feature. I would
prefer if there was a way to pay money for a newly developed feature
instead.
Actually I don't think this is too much of a problem. It's up to the person giving the gift to not give $1000 to one individual but rather $20 to a number of different individuals -- and that amount of money is nothing that one has to feel bad about when receiving it.

Also, I think it is not a good idea to couple donations and *features*. Often enough, even developers can't tell who developed which feature. Additionally, if a particular developer decides to start working on a particular feature, it is not at all clear whether he will actually finish that feature -- or whether he will simply stop in the middle of the work, or whether somebody else will finish it or whatever.

Therefore I rather agree with cbbrowne's point of view: If you as a user like the application as-is, and want to give an amount of money, then just pick your favorite developer and give him a gift -- and that's it. There's no obligation involved here: neither for you (like being forced to give money), nor for the developer (like being forced to implement a particular feature). Instead, the gift simply expressed you appreciation for the work that the developer already has invested in the application. And that's it.

Christian

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


Reply via email to