-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2002 15:29, Derek Atkins wrote: > I for one am truly interested in hearing what these instabilities are.. > I -thought- it was pretty stable before I left for vacation, and you, > Christian, even said so. Did it become less stable while I've been > gone? If so, how?
No, it did not become "less stable". I _thought_ it was pretty stable, _too_. But when I now tried my real data, I discovered that it is _not_ pretty stable, at least not compared to gnucash-1.6. The point simply is that I haven't been using it for actual daily work before, and when I did this now, I discovered far more still unstable points than I thought there were. I'll continue working with this now, and I'll file bugzillla bugs every time I discover reproducible errors. However, I've already stumbled over a bunch of errors without being able to reproduce them. And this led me to my previous message. :-\ Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBPg8JOGXAi+BfhivFAQGGmAQAnJHK0dyRFLuhz/9/9aOSAU5XuJd0/HDt nwfW4iSWPHgO3I3Dh4LHXx+D6KEYA/NcdbTFwODOoefrxC9XrNwzxc0Rf+f8vu2O CoAAwAyjEDtOlvqiooNOHqSqYV58NnA8YhYLzg5hiiIeb4JxjKcBfLEc1jZzkfiN pwsE/RExkQ8= =JTfe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
