I did not mean my reply to imply that there was a single unbalanced split denoting losses or gains. Apologies to all that saw it that way.
I think I was trying to say that you are allowed to have your "cash" go up without a corresponding income account going "down" when you make a capital gain. -----Original Message----- Read my text: IMHO there IS NO SPLIT THAT REPRESENTS THE GAIN/LOSS. <phillip> I agree </phillip> <snip> You don't need a "balancing" split -- there is nothing to balance. And no, I do NOT believe that you should have a single, unbalanced split to denote losses or gains. <phillip> I did not mean my reply to sound like I was advocating that. Sorry Derek. </phillip> -derek "Phillip Shelton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: <snip> > Maybe, (And you would lean toward this, Derek?) capital gain is allowed to be >"unbalanced"? The balancing entry is the reduction of the "hard" asset. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
