Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why go with something that will continue to be flaky for years to come
> when there's an /already mature/ technology that is /already part of
> GNOME/?
Well, the counter argument is that the point was to try to separate
ourselves from Gnome -- in particular to enable a Qt/KDE UI. Adding
yet more gnome deps doesn't quite help in that regards.
However, I still think a set of bonobo services would be a good
thing. Any volunteers?
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
