On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:23:22 +0100 Stan Pinte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello, > > I filled in a bug in bugzilla. details there > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108375 > > but I would like to know the list's opinion of the following: > > --> the problem is there: (in qif-to-gnc.scm)... > > if there is a payee...then the "memo" field is dropped...whereas in my > case I would like to get the "memo", as description... > > I don't know what is the standard QIF-gnucash convention, but I > certainly would like the "memo" to be used as a description in my > gnuucash TXN, rather than the payee...or maybe a concatenation of the two. > > > thanks for your comments...I can send a patch once we agreed on something. > > > sorry, I just noticed that the "memo" for each QIF transaction was stored, but as "split" memo... I suppose my proposition of merging the payee and the memo to fill in the gnc:txn-description field would not be ok for all cases... Stan. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
