On Tue, 27 May 2003 18:05:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) wrote:
> > I don't believe that the code is 'really' unstable because it is already
> > used in some other applications (like epiphany) and i never noticed any
> > problems with this applications (related to that code). Maybe it isn't
>
> By 'unstable' I didn;t mean 'crashes', I really meant 'will change
> in the future'. Since people already complain about how hard it is to
> build gnucash ...
Ok, that shouldn't be a problem, because the code is copied.
> > 'really' stable but it is at last more stable than any code which we could
> > create to do the same tasks if we don't want to use libegg.
>
> OK, copying in is OK. FWIW, the policy that we used to have was that
> we would copy stuff to the /lib directory, instead of /src, so if you
> wanted to, you could put *all* of libegg into /lib.
>
> I don't know where you put that code, but if you didn't put it in /lib,
> then please think about moving it there.
Ok, i'll move it there (i didn't notice the lib directory yet).
Regards
Jan Arne Petersen
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
