> > But the majority of documentation in > > txt files in the source tree is NOT user servicable (except, perhaps,
The src/docs directory is for developer docs only, and needs to stay close to the source. > I have to agree with Derek, developer docs should be separated from user > docs. I have no objection to keeping some of the user contributed > website pages in the gnucash-docs module. I expect this would make it > easier for Linas to convert them to html for the website. However, I > think it should be Linas that says what format he wants website pages in > so its easiest for him to add them to the website as he updates bits and > pieces. I prefer to get user-contributed web pages as an html fragment. To publish a page, I wrap the fragment with the stock gnucash PHP includes so that all pages get the same headers and footers and menus. If someone wants a copy of the raw PHP, e.g. for translation purposes, they just need to ask & I can provide that. Otherwise, if people just want the 'finished' html, website can be easily copied with w3mir or other web-mirroring tool. Several people have write perms to the website, and I can add a few more. I haven't been a reposnsive webmaster of late; I don't mind if someone else responsible can help out. I just don't want to wake up one day and find the site broekn and need to have to fix it. --linas -- pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933 _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
