-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Dienstag, 8. Juli 2003 00:06, Derek Atkins wrote: > Benoit Gr�goire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On July 7, 2003 12:48 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > > > I'm trying to decide if I can make a reasonable assumption: is it > > > reasonable to assume that a QIF file will use the same format/notation > > > for all numeric values? > > > > I think that's reasonnable. I know we've seen some pretty fucked up QIF > > files, but I don't see HOW a program could output mixed numeric formats > > by accident > > Well, that's part of the question. Both existing qif importers > test each numeric value separately. This seems like a lot of work > to me, but I'm wondering if there is a reason that it's done this > way. I don't know.
The author of that other tool "QIF-Cleaner" (mentioned by me 1-2 weeks ago) wrote that we encountered exactly this problem but *only* for QIF files which have been copied together *manually*. To me that would mean it is a reasonable assumption for the "normal user" to only provide QIF files with uniform locale format. Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPwtSl2XAi+BfhivFAQF/BgP+Kbq+VIHfaM9a4X6T2hEJEq6bVuXFof0L z1f+Pd/HECfFpmRE3YyFlI2ZQsY73Tr1LN53UnMG6tlUhi58vYAj7wakNnMkDVF/ MWXeR6OTB6NGlH4zxMF6B5EiPVZXj7WPqsyY26BnrBm9Q7MhNpXuZNRU40LAgtsr 14rLyOHjbOA= =rSY9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
