Derek Atkins wrote:
Why can't you have a transaction that looks like this:
[snip]

Ohhhhh, me likes.


I admit that it's harder to see the "$100" gross salary in this
method, but part of me really thinks that that should be ancillary
data.  Adding extraneous accounts seems.... poor.

Yup, you just cut out a bunch of accounts, and also cut out a bunch of repetitive transactions too. Nice.


I'll write up a revised payroll thingy and send to the list using this approach.

--
-**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*---
 Jon Lapham  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
 Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA     http://www.extracta.com.br/
 Web: http://www.jandr.org/
***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------


_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to