This (serendipitously) has a few nice side effects.
1) All the images in the figures/ subdirectory naturally get grouped according to chapter. Easier to relate an image to a where it is located in the text. Easier to find unused images, etc.
2) No namespace conflicts with section ids. With docbook, each subsection must have a unique name. This is a pain with sections like "concepts", and "account setup" and "putting it all together" that basically exist in EVERY chapter. For example, with chapter name prefixes, you can use "invest_concepts" and "ap_concepts" and "ar_concepts", etc, etc. No namespace conflicts.
So, anyway, my question for the list is, does anyone have a problem with this nomeclature? If not, I'm going to go through all the user guide and switch them all over to this naming scheme.
-- -**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*--- Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/ Web: http://www.jandr.org/ ***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
