Tim, Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This would seem to be the same bug as > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112737 > and/or > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105225 > > Should 112737 and 105225 be dup'd to 119001? > > BTW, is the patch against 1.8.x, 1.8 branch in CVS, or CVS head? I'd like to > test it, and I'm running 1.8 branch from CVS. So, do I already have the patch > (I'm running branch from last night), do I need to update to head, or do I > need to apply the patch to my local copy of the sources? I suspect that 1.8-CVS and CVS-HEAD are very close -- close enough that I bet the patch works on both without thinking hard. If it was made against 1.8.4 I suspect it will STILL work right.. There has not been much motion on the SX code. > Regards, > Tim -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
