Jeff MacDonald wrote:
I respectfully disagree with use of "in development".. we *know* it's in
development, and newbies might think that if it's in development it is
somehow unstable or that they should look for 'better' documentation
instead. just be careful about wording :)

I agree 100%.


Check out the HTML-ified version of my proposal I just made.

http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/
http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/documentation.html

By "in development" documentation I meant for some future version of gnucash that doesn't exist as the stable version yet. We would want newbies to not use it. I think it is probably clearer to look at the example pages I made.

The "in developement" version of docs for the stable version of GnuCash would simply be the v1.8 docs (in this case). The words "in development" would not appear.

Thanks,
-Jon

--
-**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*---
 Jon Lapham  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
 Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA     http://www.extracta.com.br/
 Web: http://www.jandr.org/
***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------


_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to