Derek Atkins wrote: [snip]
I'll note that MOST of the lot/period/sql support is UI-agnostic. Reports are UI-agnostic, too. Anything UI-agnostic can (and IMHO should) still be done on HEAD.
Basically, I do not WANT to have a 1.10 release. I want the next release to be 2.0. Is that what you want to hear? I consider 1.10 a "failsafe contingency plan."
[snip]
True... The way I would say it is that new UI (glade/etc.) should be g2, but anything non-UI (reports/engine/backend) should be HEAD...
Woohoo, this is great to hear. Is this the position of the other developers? If so, we need to make this known.
-- -**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*--- Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/ Web: http://www.jandr.org/ ***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
