I am proposing to rename them using the "section name consistent" [1] nomenclature:
chapter1.xml -> chapter_oview.xml chapter2.xml -> chapter_basics.xml ... chapter14.xml -> chapter_bus_pay.xml
Advantages: No need to rename many files when rearranging, adding, removing chapters. Easier to find the chapter you want to edit (ie: if you want to work on the depreciation chapter, you edit chapter_dep.xml instead of chapter11.xml).
Disadvantages: None? I guess the chapters won't show up in order when you "ls" the folder?
Possible variation: Could strip off the word "chapter", ie: use "oview.xml" instead of "chapter_oview.xml".
Possible variation: s/chapter/ch/, ie: use "ch_oview.xml" instead of "chapter_oview.xml".
So, wadda ya think? Note, this has no affect on the final product. The Concept Guide will still display "Chapter 1: Overview" for chapter 1, for example.
[1] "section consistent nomenclature" means that all the sections within a chapter already use a consistent prefix. All chapter1 section ids begin with "oview".
-- -**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*--- Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/ Web: http://www.jandr.org/ ***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
