Re: Use of complete GList functionality? Change to GSList?

[Dave Peticolas]

Derek Atkins writes:
> Is a KVP_TYPE_GLIST guaranteed to always just a list of kvp_values?
> If so, then I can deal with that :)

Yes, that is a guarantee.


> One of my major issues with the GList construct is that there is no
> way to validate the _type_ of list you've got.  In other words, there
> is no way to be assured that you have list of type foo.  I could pass
> a GList of type foo to a function that is expecting a GList of type
> bar, and there is no way to detect that.  :(

True. Care must be taken :)

dave

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel