On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 15:23, Derek Atkins wrote: > Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I realize that isn't list isn't comprehensive, but we > > > > should support all the basic kvp types, including int64 > > > > and double. Also, boolean would be good, too. > > > > > > True, but this list is "comprehensive" in that it covers everything > > > that the current Query can cover. But yea, we should be able to > > > cover all the KVP types. > > > > Oh, well in that case you're just wrong :) You missed the 'kvp' > > query api, unless you were looking at the stable sources. > > :-P > > It handles everything except KVP and RecnCells -- is that better? > > [snip] > > Well, first take a look at the existing api. > > Yea, and the current KVP basically does what I said: you pass it > a slot path and a kvp_value to compare against ;)
Sounds good. dave
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
