I maintain the Debian package of gnucash. It has been requested that sql support be compiled in. It is not clear to me how extensive the changes this makes are. Is it mostly just a new library? Is the executable very different?
Basically, I am trying to determine the best way to handle this. If, as I suspect, the biggest change is the new library, then I may simply distribute one package with sql support built in. The problem is that I don't want the basic package to depend on postgresql (it would suggest it and those wishing to use that feature would need to install it). An alternative would be to have a second package that simply contains the extra needed library for postgresql support, a gnucash binary (which then replaces the original), and any other files needed for sql support. So, is it feasible to do one of the above, or do I really need two separate gnucash packages? -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel