I am aware of the very slow performance with budget. I have some ideas to improve it but have not found time to put into it. It seems to only affect Windows. It runs fine on linux.
Phil On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Proberts042 <probert...@gmail.com> wrote: > Slow to me is several minutes. > > I have installed GnuCash on a Linux operating system (Ubuntu) and it seemed > to work well. However, did not try the Budget feature there. I would like > to > use an open source operating system but sharing word processor files with > my > teachers and students proves difficult because Google Drive and LibreOffice > render Word tables remarkably differently than Microsoft, and even make > changes so that the documents are really different when run in Windows > again. I know of no way to get around this. I hope that these problems are > solved in the near future as I would love to use Linux machines > exclusively. > We want to move more toward open-source software systems. GnuCash, even > with > its limitations running in a Windows environment, is great (except for > Budget). We have also started using OpenSiS-CE for our school information > management system. > > So I guess I will wait for the software experts to see what they can do > about this Budget thing. I would really like to use this feature for > planning. > > Thanks for your help > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4. > nabble.com/Budget-Slowing-Down-Windows-10-tp4693398p4693425.html > Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
