On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, John Ralls wrote:

On May 7, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Mike or Penny Novack 
<stepbystepf...@dialup4less.com> wrote:
HOWEVER -- you have raised a more general question, perhaps misunderstanding something. 
The "built in default" accounts that come with gnucash CoA skeletons are just 
for convenience satisfying the needs of many new users. There is nothing magic about the 
types of accounts included, either that they would be necessary or sufficient. If you 
find you need another category of asset accounts (another sub tree under assets) simply 
add that. Same with liabilities and equity (and thus for income and expense).
That’s not quite right. The account *types* are hard coded and control program 
behavior: For example, types STOCK and FUND have a different register display 
from the rest. There is neither UI nor API for adding types.

Regards,
John Ralls


Misunderstanding. The term "type" being used to mean different things.

The original question was using "type" in the sense I was answering the question. Things like "gift cards", "pre-paid debit cards, bank account associated debit cards, etc. are not "types" in the sense you mean (STOCK, FUND, etc.)

Assets of type (sense 1) stock, fund, etc. not the same thing as accounts of type (sense2) STOCK, FUND. << one could keep books under gnucash involving assets of type (sense1) stocks ad funds without using the built in (sense2) types. though it might help doing that to have learned bookkeeping in the old pen and ink on paper days >>

Michael D Novack

--
There is no possibility of social justice on a dead planet except the equality 
of the grave.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to