> On Jul 6, 2018, at 8:30 AM, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: > > John, > > On Fri, July 6, 2018 10:43 am, John Ralls wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 6, 2018, at 6:49 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> Richard, >>> >>> Richard Ullger <rull...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> John, >>>> >>>> Some links are pointing back to gnome bugzilla. >>>> >>>> See comment 3 on https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796665 >>> >>> The reason for this is that the commentor (YOU!) explicity put in the >>> URL instead of using the appropriate shorthand "Bug #796665". >>> >>> At this point I know of no way to fix this. >>> >> >> That said, references to non-gnucash bugs using the shorthand will >> probably get a bad URL because we didn’t copy all of Gnome’s database. >> There’s no reasonable way to fix that either. >> >> That’s also unlikely to be the only kind of stale URLs in the bug >> database. The internet has changed a lot over the last 17 years (the >> oldest bug, 58566, was opened 2001-08-05). > > I suspect I could write a script using the Perl interface that would > search for any references like this, and possibly hand-modify the SQL > tables that need adjusting. If nothing else I can look for any comment > references to bugzilla.gnome.org <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/> or a bug# > that's not in the database. > > Actually, I can probably do that in the json! So there are 361 bugs that > have a reference to "show_bug.cgi". Only 287 of those reference > bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi>. > > Searching for "Bug # xxx" which wasn't imported is going to be harder. > > I'm not sure what to change the bugzilla.gnome.org > <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/> references to...
I assume that you mean you don’t know what to change bugzilla.gnome.org <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/> references to when they refer to a bug that we didn’t import to bugs.gnucash.org <http://bugs.gnucash.org/>. I suppose that there are two alternatives: We can import those bugs too or just leave the links as-is. I don’t think that we want to import them. (The third alternative, find their gitlab instances, will likely apply only to a very few of them: Only open bugs being actively worked on or identified as still a serious problem were migrated.) It’s worth noting that Gnome missed their date for shutting down new bugs, too. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all> still lists *lots* of projects. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
