Thanks for the run-down.

So simply a case of Universe not pulling an update from Sid yet then? (or will 
that never happen and each release’s Universe is always tied to Testing? and 
then Stable, etc.) I know there is a separate backports repository as well. 
Perhaps that’s a better solution?

Regards,
Adrien

> On Jul 31, 2018, at 12:46 PM, Tommy Trussell <tommy.truss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:10 PM Adrien Monteleone 
> <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> I’m not sure what kind of work this would be on the devs, but Ubuntu has a 
> special procedure for LibreOffice and Firefox (if not other apps, perhaps 
> Thunderbird and Chrome/Chromium as well) where new versions are available in 
> the LTS repos either as available or by point-release.
> 
> This may be an option for GnuCash.
> 
> I’m not sure what’s involved, or if the team just has to ask Canonical to 
> give it the same special treatment.
> 
> But Canonical might prefer to push for an up-to-date Snap instead.
> 
> Regards,
> Adrien
> 
> 
> What you're describing is a special Ubuntu maintainer -- essentially someone 
> who has volunteered (and in some cases paid?) to keep particular packages 
> up-to-date. They have identified a few "mission critical" packages such as 
> web browsers and LibreOffice as deserving special treatment.
> 
> Most packages, like GnuCash, get copied in from Debian and go into the 
> "Universe" repository. The folks in charge of those are called "Masters of 
> the Universe" or MOTU.
> 
>  
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to