Geert: Is it possible to install two versions, side-by-side, in Windows? Thanks Paul
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:56 AM Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> wrote: > David, > > You keep saying this. While I respect your choice to stay on the safe > side, > the only way to know if gnucash 3.x works for you is to test it. That's > pretty > easy in Windows. > > So I encourage you to run a few tests on a backup of your data file and > evaluate how good or bad that works out. I'd love to hear your personal, > first-hand experience instead of how you're currently expressing concerns > based on what you've read. > > There are issues, but it's not like gnucash 3.x has suddenly become > completely > unusable. > > Regards, > > Geert > > Op zondag 25 november 2018 04:07:52 CET schreef David Carlson: > > Paul, > > > > You are not the only one that concerned about whether the new releases > meet > > your needs any better than what you used before. A bird in hand is > > better... > > > > I am staying with my favorite 2.6.15 or 2.6.17 until I am satisfied that > > 3.4 or whatever is sufficiently well debugged to not present any serious > > regressions for my needs. > > > > David C > > > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 4:33 PM Paul Schwartz <pmjs1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I have files that contain many years of transactions [<2 MB]. Last year > > > was > > > done with 2.6.12 which I think provides accurate numbers. Starting a > new > > > computer on Windows 10, I would like to transition to 3.3 and stay > > > current. > > > > > > When I open an old file and run a balance sheet I get some very strange > > > results in my stock accounts. Some stocks are very simple: a purchase > for > > > cash, one transaction. Sometimes the report left justifies the amount > of > > > the stock and correctly reports the value of the purchase. Sometimes it > > > right justifies the amount of the stock and reports zero for the > value. I > > > have looked at how the accounts are setup, and they look identical. > > > > > > I have other stocks that are more complex: there are simple purchases > and > > > then debits or credits for $ amounts with zero shares. Those are always > > > reported with zero value. > > > > > > I would like to solve the simple cases first. Any help is greatly > > > appreciated as I don't want to be frozen to using the old gnucash > version. > > > > > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > > > gnucash-user mailing list > > > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > > > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > > > ----- > > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnucash-user mailing list > > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > > > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.