I just read the bug report you mentioned. Yes, that sounds exactly like what is happening to me.
It sounds like the fix has been found. Hopefully it gets rolled into a release soon. Thanks again to all the contributors, Mike On Jan 16, 2019, at 9:42 PM, David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com<mailto:sunfis...@yahoo.com>> wrote: This sounds like bug #796687, which had been discussed on gnucash-devel recently. David On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:45, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us<mailto:jra...@ceridwen.us>> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Mike stagl > <m_st...@hotmail.com<mailto:m_st...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > For what its worth, I updated to Gnucash 3.4 on both a Debian 9 machine and a > Windows 7 machine, and both fail to apply the Tax Reporting Options. > > Either this is a bug, or I am doing something wrong on both machines! > > Thanks all! The Tax Report Options dialog doesn’t seem to be storing the Name or Type fields, so only the Edit button underneath is enabled. The accounts are getting marked tax related and when one clicks Edit and reselects e.g. Individual Income Tax then the rest of the dialog is enabled and the settings entered before are still set. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org<mailto:gnucash-user@gnucash.org> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
