> On Mar 31, 2019, at 3:35 AM, David T. via gnucash-user > <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > > Oh. Let me go to nabble to figure out that you're replying to my post... > now, having closed all the spammy windows for super resume...
Or just use e-mail instead of Nabble? (or I’m sure something like uBlock Origin could zap those windows before they come into existence) > Having the new account assistant create a specific set of accounts IN NO WAY > is "enabling business features." It's just a bunch of accounts. The features > are always "enabled." We might as well speak of "enabling" double entry > features in Gnucash when we open a register in transaction view. > It is convenient, to be sure, to have these accounts created for me, but this > is in no way something in preferences, as was implied in the message to which > I was responding. > There is NO special setting. To quote Monty Python, there is NO severed head > beneath the bed. > David T. I just opened a new file, chose the default ‘common accounts’ which did not include A/R and A/P and sure enough, the “Business” menu is visible as was the “New Invoice” button. (I didn’t go through the trouble of creating an invoice or bill and seeing what would happen) This was not always the case, certainly not at some point in the 2.6 series. I distinctly remember having to ‘enable business features’ to both get the Business menu as well as making the New Invoice button visible. I think doing so also created the special A/R and A/P accounts in my tree. Perhaps the business features which were originally an add-on module were finally integrated into the main program at some point. Regards, Adrien _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
