I omitted the word import as in transaction import matching scheme. David Carlson
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, 2:10 PM David Carlson <david.carlson....@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't there also a change to the transaction matching scheme ? I thought > that was the main reason that only 2.6.21 could read both forms. > > David Carlson > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, 11:57 AM Adrien Monteleone < > adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: > >> If I recall correctly, dates are represented differently at some point in >> the 3.x series, but this might only be for SQL. >> >> Regards, >> Adrien >> >> > On Feb 9, 2020 w7d40, at 10:21 PM, David Carlson < >> david.carlson....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > According to the developers, the only pre-3.x version of GnuCash that is >> > expected to read data files that have been touched by a 3.x version is >> > release 2.6.21, possibly with a suffix depending on the OS it is run in. >> > When a file is first touched by 3.x there are some unspecified changes >> that >> > may be at least partially mentioned in other threads here. They do not >> > specify if there are any changes in the database variations, but there >> > probably are. >> > >> > David Carlson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnucash-user mailing list >> gnucash-user@gnucash.org >> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user >> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see >> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. >> ----- >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. >> > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
