Recently someone called the treaurer of a group associated with mine. They told 
her the chair of the group had an emergency and needed funds. The treasurer did 
not have access to their Paypal account so he sent funds from his personal 
account. It turned out to be a scam. Actually a pretty well known scam. You get 
a call or email that a friend or relative has lost their purse or wallet and 
cell phone and needs funds immediately.

Apparently, they are targeting organizations now.

Be careful out there,
Will

On 2020 Jul 26, at 07-26 11:25:10, Michael or Penny Novack 
<stepbystepf...@comcast.net> wrote:

On 7/26/2020 11:39 AM, John Ralls wrote:

> Did nobody read the footnote? The book was published in 1985, long before 
> electronic payments became widely available. No doubt the 2020 edition would 
> say something like "independently documented transfer" with a mention 
> somewhere that that used to mean a check but now covers a variety of payment 
> methods.
> 
> Incidentally, the textbook also says that checks should ideally require two 
> signatures. I don't know how to impose that control over electronic transfers 
> but the local newspaper reports two or three cases of embezzlement a year 
> where it's obvious that a two-person control would have prevented the crime.
> 
Even today, just because you CAN use "electronic checks" doesn't mean you would 
want to. That's going to depend on the average number of checks per payee since 
a bank transfer requires knowing/storing the bank routing number and account of 
each. To use the organization where I have FINALLY been relieved as treasurer, 
perhaps 50+ different payees but rarely more than two checks to the same payee 
in a year. SOME payees, like for governmental filing fees provide a site, might 
even require electronic payment. But only a couple of those payments n a year.

So if an orchard manager sent in a envelope of receipts for reimbursement, that 
would have a return address to mail a paper check to. It's only the less well 
off that would be sending me receipts like that, a few at a time. The ones well 
off might just save up a bunch and hand them to me at the next board meeting 
and I write them a check then and there.

Best solutions depend on the work flow. The work required to obtain the bank 
information for a direct transfer is more than the work of writing/mailing a 
check. More than doing it twice. But if you are going to be doing it ten times 
(to the same payee) getting the bank info might be quicker.

Michael D Novack


_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to