I’ve received several emails like this recently, all ostensibly related to bugs I had reported, but the text is not relevant to the bug, and has numerous suspicious URLs which I haven’t followed.
The text doesn’t appear in the comments section relating to the bugs. Michael Hendry > On 4 Nov 2021, at 14:04, bugs-ad...@bugs.gnucash.org wrote: > > https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797953 > > Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1...@yahoo.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ahmedsayeed1...@yahoo.com > > --- Comment #3 from Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1...@yahoo.com> --- > [gdb/symtab] Handle DW_TAG_type_unit in process_psymtab_comp_unit > > When running test-case gdb.cp/cpexprs-debug-types.exp with target board > unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-5, I run into: > ... > (gdb) file cpexprs-debug-types^M > Reading symbols from cpexprs-debug-types...^M > ERROR: Couldn't load cpexprs-debug-types into GDB (eof). > ERROR: Couldn't send delete breakpoints to GDB. > ERROR: GDB process no longer exists > GDB process exited with wait status 23054 exp9 0 0 CHILDKILLED SIGABRT > SIGABRT > ... https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/crypto/crypto-for-investing/ > > We're running into this abort in process_psymtab_comp_unit: > ... > switch (reader.comp_unit_die->tag) > { > case DW_TAG_compile_unit: > this_cu->unit_type = DW_UT_compile; > http://www.compilatori.com/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > break; > case DW_TAG_partial_unit: > this_cu->unit_type = DW_UT_partial; > http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > break; > default: > abort (); http://www.logoarts.co.uk/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > } > ... > because reader.comp_unit_die->tag == DW_TAG_type_unit. > http://www.slipstone.co.uk/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > Fix this by adding a DW_TAG_type_unit case. > > Tested on x86_64-linux. > > gdb/ChangeLog: http://embermanchester.uk/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > [gdb/symtab] Handle DW_TAG_type_unit in process_psymtab_comp_unit > > When running test-case gdb.cp/cpexprs-debug-types.exp with target board > unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-5, I run into: > http://connstr.net/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > ... > (gdb) file cpexprs-debug-types^M > Reading symbols from cpexprs-debug-types...^M > http://joerg.li/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > ERROR: Couldn't load cpexprs-debug-types into GDB (eof). > ERROR: Couldn't send delete breakpoints to GDB. > ERROR: GDB process no longer exists > http://www.jopspeech.com/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > GDB process exited with wait status 23054 exp9 0 0 CHILDKILLED SIGABRT > SIGABRT > ... > > We're running into this abort in process_psymtab_comp_unit: > http://www.wearelondonmade.com/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > ... > switch (reader.comp_unit_die->tag) > { > case DW_TAG_compile_unit: > https://waytowhatsnext.com/technology/korean-technology/ > this_cu->unit_type = DW_UT_compile; > break; > case DW_TAG_partial_unit: > http://www.iu-bloomington.com/technology/miui13/ > this_cu->unit_type = DW_UT_partial; > break; > default: > abort (); https://komiya-dental.com/technology/miui-13/ > } > ... > because reader.comp_unit_die->tag == DW_TAG_type_unit. > http://www-look-4.com/tech/nvidia-and-samsung/ > Fix this by adding a DW_TAG_type_unit case. > > Tested on x86_64-linux. > https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/technology/grt-r910/ > gdb/ChangeLog: > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
