Michael,
I have a sole professional services consulting practice, B2B, with
clients.
No product sales. My approach to cash accounting has worked for me for
more
than two decades; it might not work as well for others.
Regards,
Rich
I understood what you were doing worked for you. I was simply pointing
out that for people with a business like yours (no "sales"), using the
"adjusting transactions" method, accrual to cash and back again would
not be onerous. It can, of course, be onerous for those whose business
involves "sales" because then there are likely many accounts whose cash
balance is required to fill in line items for tax reporting, etc. You
would not have that problem.
I was also wanting to point out that gnucash can be used JUST to produce
invoices and track which paid using a separate set of books (on the
accrual basis) even though the main books are cash basis. In other
words, no need for a different (non-gnucash) application to do that.
There are other situations where (additional) sets of virtual books can
be useful to provide information, especially when major parts of one's
economic activity is virtual.
Michael D Novack
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
