Ok, so I see there was no change to gnucash to fix this only a fix to libofx. So I shouldn't even bother looking at the combination of 4.9 and 0.10.2. I will upgrade and try a few different time stamp/ offset combinations.
Thanks On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:32:17AM -0800, John Ralls wrote: > Mark, > > AIO expands to "all-in-one" and refers to the Windows and macOS bundles that > we publish containing GnuCash and all of its dependencies. Flatpak is > something of a hybrid in that the GNOME dependencies are provided by the > flatpak runtime and our build script adds AQBanking, Boost, and libofx. > > The relevant commit is > https://github.com/libofx/libofx/commit/70ae1b44fd4ea00175ae9fa5a6abd12243534fc2 > and it was to fix https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798267. > > Interestingly that bug was for Australian Eastern Standard Time, +10:00 > instead of US Eastern Standard Time -5:00. > > Regards, > John Ralls > > > On Jan 13, 2022, at 10:07 AM, Mark Sutton <m...@lazo.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:28:06AM -0800, john wrote: > >> Derek, > >> > >> The libofx change was in libofx-0.10.3 but I also (as I generally do) set > >> the same patch to libofx 0.10.2 in the build repositories so GnuCash 4.8 > >> and 4.9 include the fix. > >> Since the 4.9 AIO still doesn't work there must be another path where the > >> TZ is bering applied backwards. > >> > > I'm not sure what AIO is, but I have 4.9 installed on funtoo. Right now > > libofx-0.10.2 > > is installed, but I can emerge libofx-0.10.3. > > I have also run into this problem but I am in UTC-8 or -7 depending on the > > time > > of year so the problem only manifested when DST set in. I think I just > > massaged the > > file to make the transaction post at noon then it didn't matter. > > > > I have five years of TD files to import so I don't mind doing some tests. > > So what combination should work? gnc-4.9 with libofx-0.10.2? > > if so does that break with 0.10.3 > > I can not find the commit that might have fixed this so I can't see what it > > does. > > Does it check version and apply the correction or not. > > > > -mark > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> According to that bug it was fixed in LibOFX in June 2021... And the fix > >>> appears to be in 0.10.3 > >>> What version of LibOFX is in use? > >>> > >>> -derek > > _______________________________________________ > > gnucash-user mailing list > > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > > ----- > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.