Thanks for responding. I figured out what I was doing wrong. The hierarchy was an account of type asset, which contained my cash assets, and under that was the stock account. I moved things around by changing the parent account, etc such that the top account was an asset account representing the brokerage account, and under that I now have an asset account for the cash assets and a stock account with my stock assets, and now the top brokerage account shows the expected total value.
I just needed to get the hierarchy right. :^) On 6/5/25 9:46 PM, Ken Farley wrote: > I don't know how you have your accounts set up, but as far as I know the > behavior you wish is standard behavior. > > For example, my brokerage account is a sub-account of the Assets > top-level account. It is type Asset. > Under that account is a Bank account for the cash balance in my brokerage. > Also under the brokerage account is a bunch of investment accounts, > type Stock, Mutual Fund, etc. > > The Brokerage account shows the total account value which is the sum of > all the sub-account Cash, Stock, Mutual Fund, etc. accounts. > > If you're not seeing a sum of all your sub-accounts what are you seeing? > Do all the subs have a value? > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > [email protected] > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
