> I don't think you can hope for consistently reliable ranges, but this > may very well be a bug anyway. The algorithm for estimate_score was > changed in 3.7.2. Can you try it again with 3.7.2 or 3.7.3 (or current > CVS) and report the results?
Here are the results using 3.7.3; I've repeated the 3.6 results below. = W+60.5 [correct] = W+61.1 (upper bound: 61.1, lower: 61.1) = 59.6 [better: should be 60.5] = 62.1 [better: should be 61.5] experimental_score's range is now correct, so may be useful to me; I'll try it on some more positions. estimate_score is still strange: surely upper and lower bounds should only be equal when the only moves left are filling dame? Or does upper/lower bound only take into account unsettled groups? If so clarifying the docs would be useful. Darren [1]: showboard final_score estimate_score experimental_score black experimental_score white [2]: = A B C D E F G H J 9 . X X . . . . . . 9 8 X . X O O O . . . 8 7 X X X O . O + . . 7 6 . . X O . . O . . 6 5 O O O . + . . O O 5 4 . . X O O . . . . 4 3 X X X O . O O O . 3 2 . . . O . O . . O 2 WHITE (O) has captured 12 stones 1 O O O O . . . . . 1 BLACK (X) has captured 1 stones A B C D E F G H J = W+60.5 = W+59.5 (upper bound: 59.5, lower: 59.5) = 58.0 = 60.5 _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
