We could also consider using the new DB in the upcoming KGS tournament. Evan
On Apr 8, 2005 1:01 PM, Douglas Ridgway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would it be time to bring up the fuseki db again? A few months ago I > submitted a larger one, based on 35k amateur games, but there were > concerns about the size of the source and binary, and it never got > anywhere. I haven't found time to rewrite everything to compress it, and > likely won't, but it'd be reasonably easy for me to generate a smaller one > given a target size. That loses some of the width/depth advantages of the > new, bigger db, though. There were also some ideas as to how to work > around the size issue, but no consensus. > > Options I see: > 1. Put it in as is, large size and all, and live with the size. > 2. Put it in, and work around the size (gzipped source in CVS, eg). > 3. Trim the size by reducing content. > 4. Keep the existing database. > > Comments? > > doug. > > _______________________________________________ > gnugo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel > > _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
