David wrote: > >> Following from F6, option I is us G4, them C6, us D3, and option L is > >> us D3, them C6, us G4. > >> > >> For option I: InfW=-7.00, TerrW=-3.00, InfB=-29.00, TerrB=-3.00 > >> For option L: InfW=-11.00, TerrW=-3.00, InfB=-31.00, TerrB=-3.00 > >> > >> Why would the same board evaluate differently? > > > > No idea. How are InfW and InfB computed? > > These are just short names for: > > influence4black = influence_score(INITIAL_INFLUENCE( BLACK )); > territory4black = influence_evaluate_position( BLACK, NULL, > &status ); > influence4white = influence_score(INITIAL_INFLUENCE( WHITE )); > territory4white = influence_evaluate_position( WHITE, NULL, > &status ); > > calculated directly from the functions in engine/influence.c
If I understand things correctly, the GTP commands boardsize 9 clear_board play black f6 play white g4 play black c6 play white d3 initial_influence black territory_value captures black captures white should show some difference compared to boardsize 9 clear_board play black f6 play white d3 play black c6 play white g4 initial_influence black territory_value captures black captures white but I get identical results. Plausibly there could be some badly initialized or reset data structure involved but then debugging would require doing the same intermediate processing. In other words, in order to get any further with this I would need complete and preferrably minimal code to reproduce the problem. /Gunnar _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
