Hi again, On 11/28/06, nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...) I haven't looked in detail, but since the pattern is meant to find reverse-sente moves (moves which prevent a direct threat, here an atari), maybe you want to try to add a "olib(*)>2" clause in the constraint. Not sure it'll help though.
(I forgot to mention) But if it does, you (we) should then think about trying to generalize: would it make sense to add more checks like this one directly inside of defend_against_atari_helper() ? -- nando _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
