Daniel Bump wrote: > > > Writing GUI stuff was just too difficult in C and I also became an > > adept of OO programming lately. However, development never really > > reached fully functional state after the rewrite, so it is pointless > > unless anyone is going to really finish it. > > Could you give a bit more specific details? > > How did you plan to do the GUI in Python? I think > this would require the choice of a graphics library. > How far did you get with this?
I used PyGTK, which was a straightforward choice given that Quarry always used GTK+. It also depends on several custom libraries most of which I never brought to finished state and released, the only exception being Py-notify. I got to the point where some parts actually started working, but not further, i.e. it is far from being complete. Paul _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
